Speaking in Tongues of Fire. www.aliisaacstoryteller.com
Speaking in Tongues of Fire.
http://www.aliisaacstoryteller.com

According to legend, the Danann poet Cairpre mac Edaine composed the first satire in Ireland. You’re probably thinking, ‘So what?’ Let me tell you, it was actually a big deal. A HUGE deal. It led to a High King being deposed, and a huge battle in which the fortunes of a race of people were forever altered.

In modern terms, satire refers to biting, snarky sarcasm, often humorous, generally aimed at politicians and people of power.

But back in the day of the ancient Irish, when society was founded on a code of honour, satire had a much darker, and more practical purpose. To compose a satire against someone was to challenge their authority and to threaten their status in the community. It called their honour into question, and caused them to publicly ‘lose face’.

In fact, a poet was expected to be able to raise a satire so powerful, it could cause blemishes, ie boils to appear on the face of the accused, or other deformities. Should the accused be a chieftain, or King, he was thus made unfit for rule, and could be removed and replaced.

As you can see, the power of the poet could work on behalf of the common man, who might not otherwise have had a voice when it came to bringing a grievance against a superior.

In fact, the poet, known as Fílí in Irish, was held in very high regard himself. In his highest rank, that of Chief Ollamh, he was just as powerful as the High King. Powerful people often keep their own secret agendas, however, making this ability to depose Kings mighty handy.

As high ranking as he was, however, the poet didn’t have free rein to do as he wished. As with most aspects of ancient Irish society, the satire, like just about everything else, was governed by the Brehon Laws.

In legal terms, the satire was considered an assault, and so could not be tossed about lightly on a whim. If a satire was found to be unjust and insulting, ie, it called someone names, or if it mocked their physical appearance, the poet had to pay compensation in the form of an honour price, or eric. And of course, the higher the accused’s status, the higher the fine. Legally, a satire had to be based on truth.

Mind you, we know how elusive truth can be. And sometimes, a poet’s satire back-fired. But I’m rambling again… more of that later.

The Uraicecht Becc is an ancient legal text which goes into great detail on the status of all members of early Irish society. It lists, for example, the seven grades of poet, their honour prices, and what they can expect to earn per poem. It also mentions the three qualities required of a poet; the Imbas Forosnai (knowledge which illuminates), the Teinm Láeda (‘breaking open’ ie the analysis of poetry), and the Dichetal Do Chennaib (extempore chanting).

You could strip away the mystique and claim these skills as mere inspiration, technical expertise on the art of creating poetry, and improvisation, if you like, but that would be rather short-sighted of you (read my post Imbas Forosnai Poetic Inspiration of the Irish Filidh to find out why). But according to Cormac’s Glossary, another ancient text, these techniques actually involve much preparation and ritual, which reinforces the poet’s magical and supernatural abilities.

Oh yes, magic does exist, didn’t you know? It’s all around you, but perhaps you have to open your eyes to see it.

Believe it or not, the satire fell into ten categories, the most serious of which was known as the Glám Dicenn. You want boils on the face of your wicked evil King? Then, this is the satire for you.

The glám dicenn, when raised by a powerful poet, could cause ‘the Three Blisters of Satire’ to appear on the face of the victim, thus marking his shame and dishonour for all to see.

No doubt you’re chortling away to yourself as you read this. How can a poem give someone blisters and boils? Ridiculous, right? It’s just a poem.

And yet, it’s not. To be able to physically affect someone, it’s more than just a poem, it’s a spell. These poets were a class of druid. They could enter the Otherworld and communicate with its inhabitants to seek knowledge and prophecies. They knew the secrets of the mysteries, denied to the ordinary folk. They had long, long years of learning. The history of Ireland and its people was contained in their heads. If anyone could cast a spell, use magic, it would be them.

Magic is just energy, after all.

So people, especially those who had a lot to lose, feared what the poet’s magic could do. If it was said a poet could raise boils with his blistering satire, everyone believed it, and no one wanted to risk their honour.

So it is not at all surprising, then, that Ferdia reluctantly agreed to fight against his foster-brother, Cuchullain, in single combat, rather than be shamed by the poets and satirists that sneaky Queen Medb threatened him with during the long, drawn out campaign of the Cattle Raid of Cooley.

So what did the Three Blisters of Satire look like? According to the Cauldron of the Gods: A Manual of Celtic Magick by Jan Fries, the three boils were black, red and white and represented disgrace, blemish and ugliness. They were raised on the face of a woman by a poet named Aithirne Ailgesach, who was a thoroughly nasty piece of work, and travelled around Ireland making preposterous demands under threat of glám dicenn.

So what was the woman’s great crime? She was promised to marry King Conchubar, and so refused to sleep with the evil poet and his two sons. Don’t blame her. However, she was so ashamed of the three boils which appeared on her face, that she died there and then. Nice.

The glám dicenn often resulted in death. In another story, which appears in Cormac’s Glossary, Nede is the greatest fili in all the land, and adopted son of the King, Caear. Nede composes a glám dicenn against Caear in the hope of deposing him, marrying his Queen and usurping his position.

Caear was so ashamed of his three blisters, which were red, green and white, representing shame, stain and ugliness, that he assumed a new name, ran away and went into hiding, leaving Nede to fulfill his dastardly plan.

After a year, Nede began to feel guilty about what he had done. He went in search of Caear, and found him hiding in a cleft in a rock. As the poet tried to apologise, the old King fell down dead, and the rock heated up and burst open. A splinter of rock shot out and pierced Nede through the eye, thus killing him.

Dramatic stuff, and a fine example of a wrongful satire backfiring and killing the poet who composed it. I imagine such stories served as a warning to poets not to fall too much in love with their own power and authority.

By the way, after causing a heap of mayhem up and down the country, Aithirne got his just reward… the men of Ulster rose up against him and killed him. Slowly and painfully, I hope.

And now back to Bres. The story goes that Cairpre was travelling through Ireland and stopped off at Bres’s place. Bres was High King at the time, and Cairpre being an important poet, it was expected that he would be received with the finest hospitality.

Hospitality was a matter of honour in ancient Ireland. (You can read more about that in my post, 6 Founding Principles of Ancient Irish Society.) However, Cairpre was not treated well, and shot his King down in flames with his fiery little verse. According to Shee-Eire, this is what happened;

“Cairpre, poet of the Tuatha Dé Danann, came in his travels to the house of Bres. He entered a narrow, black, dark little house, with neither fire nor chair nor bed in it. Three small cakes he was given, and they were dry. On the morrow he arose, and he was not thankful. As he crossed the threshold he made this magical curse:

‘Without food quickly on a dish,

Without cow’s milk for a calf to grow on,

Without a man’s abode under the dark of night,

Without pay for a company of storytellers –

Let that be Bres’s condition.”

Doesn’t sound so bad, does it? Cairpre was merely wishing for Bres to be on the receiving end of some of his own treatment, not to kill him. The people of Ireland were already dissatisfied with their King, though, because he favoured his Fomori heritage, and forced the Danann to work like slaves and pay high tribute to them.

“All this time that Bres held the kingship, there was murmuring against him among the Tuatha Dé Danann, for their knives were not greased by him, and however often they visited him their breaths did not smell of ale. And there was no entertainment in the household from either poet or bard or satirist or harper or piper or hornblower or juggler or jester. They saw no races, no sporting contest.”

Again, hospitality and honour seems to be called into question here. But Cairpre’s satire gave the Danann the ammunition they needed. Bres was rapidly deposed, Nuada with his new silver arm was reinstated as King, and war declared on the Fomori. The Danann were victorious. And the rest is history. Um… well, mythology, at least.


Get more mythology straight to your inbox. Sign up to my mailing list.

Or try one of these…

47 thoughts on “Speaking in Tongues of Fire

  1. You know this is giving me ideas, don’t you? Not the boils. The threats. I’ve been looking for new stuff for my arsenal. Next time I see a politician, I’ll insult them in iambic pentameter and call the paparazzi to photograph the evidence.

    Like

  2. these ancient poets were the epitome of sophistication as well as magic- the qualities and categories -and the influence! plus Boils on the face omg! Thank you again Ali for all this magical illumination of legend and story. method and craft!

    Like

  3. This is such an interesting post, dear Ali… I truly enjoyed learning about the Uraicecht Becc and the seven grades of poet, alongside the three qualities required of a poet…
    Also who would have thought that certain poets would be able to go against irish codes of honour, being their only weapons… just words…
    This last point made me think of Sophists in Ancient Greece and how Socrates was tried on two charges: corrupting the youth and impiety… being finally sentenced to death by drinking a hemlock-based liquid.
    I think something similar happened during the Inquisition … in this case the association is even stronger as most poets and writers were accused of witchcraft and sorcery, probably like may druids were back then in Éire… The book which legitimated this persecution was the so called ` Malleus Maleficarum´…(Latin for “The Hammer of Witches”, or “Hexenhammer” in German) Link. http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/
    Thanks so much for sharing. Love and best wishes. Aquileana ⭐️

    Like

      1. Ooh I don’t know… what if they decide being like royalty isn’t enough and want to promote me to a diety or something? …I don’t think I could handle that! 😀

        Like

  4. Robert and I are currently Reading about Red Aengus O’Daly – a famous file who also and deservedly got his comeuppance. Your post added greatly to our knowledge and our enjoyment. We have the O’Dalys’ ancient Bardic School close to us here on the Sheep’s Head – one of our favourite places to walk to.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’d love to walk there, Finola, and imagine all those bards in training lying in their little cells in darkness composing poetry for their masters! He sounds like quite a character… will you post about him?

      Like

  5. Without getting political may I ask why you decided to write this quite interesting post at this point (I’m basically just curious if the whole stuff with German satirist Jan Böhmermann inspired you to write it)?

    And a silly question: Did I read over it or was there no explanation of the “speaking in tongues of fire” or is it simply because of them being able to create blisters and therefore self-explanatory?

    Incidentaly did my first thought, while reading the title, go the the cross-media project “Voices of Fire” by the band Van Canto and author Christoph Hardebusch, where a bard has to defeat a dragon using his voice (very rough summary), but your tale about satiric poets/poems is just as interesting. 🙂

    Like

    1. Actually, no, but the timing is interesting. I haven’t read the poem, so I can’t comment on it. Would it have passed the Brehon Laws, I wonder? Was it simply cruel and defamatory, or based on truth? The song about the battle of the dragon and the bard has got my attention, I’ll have to look into that. To me, satire represents scalding wit and words that burn with sarcasm. I made some reference to this right at the end, but perhaps it wasn’t clear enough. Thank you for stopping by and commenting. 😊

      Like

      1. The timing is interesting indeed. 🙂

        Hmm… I have to say that I haven’t heard it completely, so I can only judge by the stuff I heard about it, but from that I do believe it was rather defamatory (there was something about mating with goats) and wouldn’t pass the laws.

        It’s not just a song, it’s an (a capella) album, a book and an audio book with songs. 😀

        I agree with you on what satire is about and I probably just didn’t catch it then no worries. 🙂
        So have fun checking it out

        Liked by 1 person

          1. Yup, this and other descriptions made the Turkish president pursue legal action (additionally there is also an old law that forbids insulting foreign people of power, which curiously is set to be discarded in 2018).

            Like

      1. Haha! Yes indeed! Actually it looks a bit like some burning alien serpent type creature is crawling out of his mouth! Yuk! Hehe… gives me the creeps every time I look at it!

        Like

  6. Mythology? or maybe history Ali. Who knows. It’s funny though that from such a time the Brehon Laws managed to survive to be quoted today, even if not followed.
    I always wonder what would have happened had the Romans not invaded and more or less wiped out the Druids in the course of their occupation. Druids who could create laws which must be adhered to that even governed hospitality. Druids who could stop a war with a word and could walk on a battlefield unscathed because of the respect they were held in.
    xxx Massive Hugs xxx

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes indeed, David! Imagine that power! You really would feel invincible, wouldn’t you? I think life would be very different indeed. In fact, it would make a great setting for a futuristic fantasy world…

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Diana. Yes, I think I prefer my satire blemish free, although sometimes I think it should still backfire on the perpetrator. Its not done ‘with honour’ these days, so it just gets personal and ugly. Ancient Irish society was governed by such intricate rules… how can anyone presume them savage and uncivilised?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The rules were fascinating, and it was interesting to me that the satire had to be based on truth. You’re so right that honor is in short supply these days. There would be a lot of fines happening under the Brehon Laws!

        Liked by 1 person

Please feel free to join in the conversation...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s